Still, the fact that it is so cheap and fast means that for some infantry it is a good choice.

It still has the same problems of all other trucks - completely unarmored and only 5 HP, meaning that it is instantly incinerated by almost anything and normally with all of its passengers as well. The final option is the Tgb 13 which is the best truck in the game - still only costing 5 points, but which actually has a high off-road speed.

The Amfibiebil is even worse, since it has no armor, but it will be a necessary choice for some units since it is the only option around for a ground transport. The Tgb m/42 s roughly equivalent, but only comes for a limited selection of infantry, with the line infantry, ATGM, reservists, and such options. Wheeled units are even more mediocre, without any good wheeled 2 armored transports, only the decidedly average Patgb XA-180 which at least has good speed, is amphibious, possesses a heavy machine gun - but whose lack of armor protection means that it will quickly die and take many of its passengers with it under enemy fire. Unfortunately these are much less useful in city fighting and drive up costs.

The autocannon IFVs are reasonably decent - the Pbv 302A has very good armor for 15 points, although its autocannon is mediocre, and the Strf 9040 is an excellent heavy IFV with very good capabilities against enemy light and medium vehicles and good armor. All of Sweden's transports are either wheeled, or come in the IFV format, which makes them very expensive. Worse, its transport options do not include a 5-point vehicle, a grave problem for providing cheap, sustained infantry presence on the ground. Along among the Scandinavian nations (at least the Blufor ones, Finland is on Redfor), it gets ATGM infantry, and it has commando infantry, line infantry, shock infantry, flamethrowers, militia, manpads, and light infantry - but no 10-man shock infantry designed for anti-infantry combat. For the Italian army, the project was initially accepted, but later abandoned due to budget cuts.Swedish infantry is an odd bunch. However, as the Cold War ended and general interest for SPAAG vehicles began declining in favour of more modern missile systems, the OTOMATIC project never received any interest from potential users. Intended to be compatible with a large number of NATO vehicles of the time, the OTOMATIC, similarly to the British Marksman system, was tested on several hulls and it was planned to be capable of fitting any NATO tank, including the Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams. The first prototype of the OTOMATIC was ready for testing in the late 1980s. Although a challenging feat, Italian engineers eventually succeeded in this endeavour, creating a vehicle that wasn’t only up to the latest technological standards but also perfectly suited, and even exceeded, various NATO requirements of the time. The basic concept behind the OTOMATIC was to take the successful 76mm Super Rapido utility cannon used on naval vessels and fit it to a suitable mobile platform in order to create a long-range SPAA vehicle that would outmatch similar designs such as the German Gepard or British Marksman system. Development of the OTOMATIC SPAAG began during the mid 1980s as a private venture of the OTO Melara company.

Otomatic anti aircraft